Suite101

To His Coy Mistress vs The Flea

Andrew Marvell's Seduction Poem Compared with John Donne's.

© Jem Bloomfield

Oct 2, 2007
To His Coy Mistress shares the same poetic tradition, and the ultimate aim of seduction, with The Flea, but Marvell and Donne are very different poets.

"To His Coy Mistress" by Andrew Marvell is often linked with John Donne’s "The Flea": they are both witty poems of seduction which display their authors’ passion and erudition in equal measure. But they are also very different works, and employ distinct rhetorical and poetic techniques.

Marvell’s Argument

Whereas "The Flea" depends upon the central “conceit” of the insect, which is then applied to the situation, Marvell’s poem employs an urbane and direct appeal, beginning “Had we but world enough, and time/ This coyness, lady, were no crime.” He is drawing on the classic topos known as carpe diem, or “seize the day”, closely to related to the memento mori, the reminder that we shall all die (“But at my back, I always hear/ Time’s winged chariot hurrying near.”) Though the memento mori is often employed in a serious context in order to provoke grave thoughts, such as the anamorphic picture of a skull which cuts across Holbein’s famous portrait known as “The Ambassadors”, Marvell uses it here to encourage his mistress to enjoy his love whilst they are still both young and alive.

Poetic Technique

There are obvious differences in the poem’s techniques as well: whilst "The Flea" employs an irregular, ingenious rhyme scheme, "To His Coy Mistress" uses elegant couplets, emphasizing Marvell’s poise and balance over the jagged enthusiasm of Donne’s lines. There are touches of self-mocking humour as well, linking his mistress with the exotic Ganges River in India, whilst he consigns himself to “complain” “by the tide of Humber”, a more prosaic river in the North of England. Likewise he describes his “vegetable love” which, if they had all eternity would “grow/ Vaster than empires and more slow.” There is a definite touch of self-deprecation in this image of the poet’s all-consuming passion spreading over like a prize marrow.

Passion vs. Logic

In making his conclusion, Marvell doesn’t depend on the same kind of logical “trap” which snaps shut at the end of the "The Flea". Rather than deploying a cunning twist of logic, Marvell depends on his heightened and poetic language, sweeping the listener along with references to the couple’s chances “Now...while thy willing soul transpires/ At every pore with instant fires” to “Tear our pleasures with rough strife/ Through the iron gates of life.” "The Flea" might amuse or impress its listener with ingenuity and wit, but "To His Coy Mistress" depends on its ability to inspire and stir with such heightened language.


The copyright of the article To His Coy Mistress vs The Flea in British Poetry is owned by Jem Bloomfield. Permission to republish To His Coy Mistress vs The Flea in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo